If your organization has utilized AI to reduce headcount on one team, has it ever led to an increase on another team, nullifying the cost savings?

Machine Learning (ML)Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Haven’t used AI to reduce headcount37%

Used AI to reduce headcount, no increase in hires elsewhere33%

Used AI to reduce headcount, led to increase in hires elsewhere16%

Used AI to reduce headcount, but haven’t tracked impact to other teams4%

Too soon to tell11%

76 PARTICIPANTS
436 viewscircle icon3 Upvotescircle icon1 Comment
Sort by:
Head of Transformation in Government3 months ago

It would be very good @Gartner for you to take this, feed it into research and provide case studies. 44% of respondents claim AI reduced the headcount definitively. I would love to know what use cases, how effectively staff were reduced, and other details. This would be very very good insight from Gartner, via its research system, or directly from the peers who are leading in AI benefit delivery.

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Are you worried about shadow AI? Do you have a formalized governance process around it?

Read More Comments

How would you quickly initiate an audit of your AI initiatives to understand their impact on talent in your organization?

What do you expect to be your main area(s) of investment for data and analytics in the next fiscal year?

Talent30%

New technology67%

Existing technology45%

Process management20%

Something else

View Results

Are there differences in how industries approach AI investment and risk?

Read More Comments

Biden’s executive order on AI describes requirements for reporting red-teaming results… if this requirement took effect tomorrow, as an actual law that applied to your company, would your org be equipped to satisfy it?

Yes, definitely!21%

Yes, probably…66%

No12%

I don’t know

View Results